Category Archives: Cyber crime data or the absence of it

Data retention is not working, or …?

Webwereld posted an article today on data retention stating that is does not work. (Click here for the article and here for the evaluation of data retention for the Dutch Second Chamber.) In the article it is written that data … Continue reading

Posted in Court decision, Cyber crime, Cyber crime data or the absence of it, Cyber ethics, Privacy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Every country needs a centralised digital incident reporting centre: the digital 112 (or 911)

More and more incidents on and around the Internet make headlining news. In a general fashion these can be categorised as “ordinary” criminality and hacks of computer systems, e.g. by so called hacktivists and criminals, but more often also by … Continue reading

Posted in Botnets, Cyber awareness, Cyber crime, Cyber crime data or the absence of it, Cyber crime reporting, Cyber security, Hacking, Internet governance, Privacy, spam | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

EC3 opened on 11 January 2013

On Friday 11 January 2013 the European Cyber Crime Centre, EC3, officially opened its doors at Europol in The Hague. If something shone through from the speeches of the panel participants, it is that there are tight budget restraints and … Continue reading

Posted in Botnets, Cyber awareness, Cyber crime, Cyber crime data or the absence of it, Cyber crime reporting, Cyber security, International cooperation: cross border aspects, Malware enforcement, Spam enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

De Natris Consult report on (inter)national cooperation

If you click on the link below you will find the report of De Natris Consult on “National cyber crime and online threats reporting centres. A study into national and international cooperation.” The study is the result of a survey … Continue reading

Posted in Botnets, Cyber crime, Cyber crime data or the absence of it, Cyber crime reporting, Cyber security, Hacking, International cooperation: cross border aspects, Internet governance, Malware enforcement, Privacy, spam, Spam enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The power of money: Fighting cross border crimes

Two news items draw my attention in the past few days. One was a message from the United Nations that the terrorist (or freedom fighters depending on your point of view of course) organisation Boko Haram could be funded by … Continue reading

Posted in Cyber crime, Cyber crime data or the absence of it, Cyber crime reporting, Cyber security, International cooperation: cross border aspects, Privacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reducing unreachable ICANN registrations

Recently ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) published a report on inaccurate registration data in her own databases. Now the question is presented to the world how can we mitigate this problem? There seems to be a very … Continue reading

Posted in Cyber crime, Cyber crime data or the absence of it, International cooperation: IP resources, Internet governance, Self regulation | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Harmonizing privacy legislation, but what about enforcement?

In a presentation EU Commissioner Viviane Reding gave a preview of the new Privacy regulation her DG is preparing. As she states, privacy rules need to be brought up to date and harmonized. With all 27 member states having the … Continue reading

Posted in Botnets, Cyber crime, Cyber crime data or the absence of it, Cyber crime reporting, Cyber security, Direct marketing, International cooperation: cross border aspects, Malware enforcement, Privacy, Spam enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment