Category Archives: International cooperation: cross border aspects

Netherlands keeps spewing malware. A call for action!

On Webwereld an article was published (click here) following a new Kaspersky malware report (click here) Q1-2013. Nothing new was mentioned here. The Netherlands remains the number 3 as far as sending malware from Dutch servers is concerned. At the … Continue reading

Posted in Botnets, Cyber awareness, Cyber crime, Cyber security, International cooperation: cross border aspects, Internet governance, Malware enforcement, Self regulation, Spam enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ICANN and the GAC: a new role is needed

Syracuse University professor Milton Mueller published a blog under the title “Will the GAC go away if the Board doesn’t follow its advice?” (click here). Having been to a, very limited, number of ICANN meetings on behalf of law enforcement … Continue reading

Posted in Cyber awareness, Cyber crime, Cyber security, International cooperation: cross border aspects, International cooperation: IP resources, Internet governance | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Breaking down silos, or cooperation in all things cyber

“We need to break down silos”, is a phrase often heard in national and international meetings around cyber security and enforcing cyber crime. So it is no coincidence that at the upcoming NLIGF (Netherlands Internet Governance Forum), the IGF, but … Continue reading

Posted in Botnets, Cyber crime, Cyber security, Hacking, International cooperation: cross border aspects, Internet governance, Privacy, spam | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How will banks ensure the safety of our money? Ddos attacks on NL banks

This week bank costumers of The Netherlands were shocked when they realised that online banking may not be as safe as they thought. Perhaps some were surprised to hear that what they think is money, is nothing but digits, something … Continue reading

Posted in Botnets, Cyber awareness, Cyber crime, Cyber education, Cyber espionage, Cyber security, Cyber warfare, Hacking, International cooperation: cross border aspects, International cooperation: IP resources, Internet governance, Self regulation, spam | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

EC3 opened on 11 January 2013

On Friday 11 January 2013 the European Cyber Crime Centre, EC3, officially opened its doors at Europol in The Hague. If something shone through from the speeches of the panel participants, it is that there are tight budget restraints and … Continue reading

Posted in Botnets, Cyber awareness, Cyber crime, Cyber crime data or the absence of it, Cyber crime reporting, Cyber security, International cooperation: cross border aspects, Malware enforcement, Spam enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Vint Cerf is wrong

At the Internet Governance Forum in Baku, I made an intervention on behalf of NL IGF, reporting on the recommendations given by the participants of Workshop 87. Participants coming from positions representing most actors on and around the Internet. As … Continue reading

Posted in Botnets, Cyber awareness, Cyber crime, Cyber crime reporting, Cyber security, International cooperation: cross border aspects, Internet governance, spam, Spam enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

State hacking. Do’s and don’ts, pros and cons

Over the past days a lot has been said and written on counter hacking by enforcement agencies. The cause is a letter Dutch Minister I. Opstelten, Security & Justice, sent to parliament (click here). Pros and cons were debated and … Continue reading

Posted in Cyber crime, Cyber espionage, Cyber warfare, Hacking, International cooperation: cross border aspects, Internet governance, Privacy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment