-
Recent Posts
- Testing, testing, testing for a more secure (internet) world
- Why are internet security standards badly deployed and what to do about it?
- Internet consolidation at EuroDIG 2019: Questions in need of an answer
- Chances and opportunities or the U.S., the E.U. and privacy regulation
- How the West was won or protecting data
Archives
- April 2020
- March 2020
- September 2019
- February 2018
- January 2018
- March 2017
- January 2017
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- November 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
Categories
- Book review
- Botnets
- Court decision
- Cyber arrests
- Cyber awareness
- Cyber crime
- Cyber crime data or the absence of it
- Cyber crime reporting
- Cyber education
- Cyber espionage
- Cyber ethics
- Cyber security
- Cyber warfare
- Digital transition
- Direct marketing
- Hacking
- International cooperation: cross border aspects
- International cooperation: IP resources
- Internet consolidation;
- Internet governance
- Internet standards;
- Malware enforcement
- Mobile
- News flash
- Privacy
- Self regulation
- Skimming
- spam
- Spam enforcement
Meta
Tag Archives: Cyber Security Strategy:
Windows XP termination. Who should lead the final transition?
Not long after the message that Microsoft will stop updating Windows XP from 8 April onwards, after extending it beyond the regular life cycle for over a year already, came the soothing message that malware will be monitored for another … Continue reading
Breaking down silos, or cooperation in all things cyber
“We need to break down silos”, is a phrase often heard in national and international meetings around cyber security and enforcing cyber crime. So it is no coincidence that at the upcoming NLIGF (Netherlands Internet Governance Forum), the IGF, but … Continue reading
Posted in Botnets, Cyber crime, Cyber security, Hacking, International cooperation: cross border aspects, Internet governance, Privacy, spam
Tagged Botnets;, Cyber crime; botnets; enforcement, Cyber crime; enforcement; international cooperation, cyber politics, Cyber Security Strategy:, Cyber security:, Cyber war;, Hacking;, Internet governance;, Malware;, public private cooperation cyber crime;, Spam
Leave a comment
How will banks ensure the safety of our money? Ddos attacks on NL banks
This week bank costumers of The Netherlands were shocked when they realised that online banking may not be as safe as they thought. Perhaps some were surprised to hear that what they think is money, is nothing but digits, something … Continue reading
Posted in Botnets, Cyber awareness, Cyber crime, Cyber education, Cyber espionage, Cyber security, Cyber warfare, Hacking, International cooperation: cross border aspects, International cooperation: IP resources, Internet governance, Self regulation, spam
Tagged Botnets;, Cross border aspects, Cyber awareness;, Cyber crime; botnets; enforcement, Cyber crime; enforcement; international cooperation, Cyber law;, cyber policy, Cyber Security Strategy:, Internet governance;, IP resources;, Malware;, public private cooperation cyber crime;, Spam
2 Comments
Why Vint Cerf is wrong
At the Internet Governance Forum in Baku, I made an intervention on behalf of NL IGF, reporting on the recommendations given by the participants of Workshop 87. Participants coming from positions representing most actors on and around the Internet. As … Continue reading
Posted in Botnets, Cyber awareness, Cyber crime, Cyber crime reporting, Cyber security, International cooperation: cross border aspects, Internet governance, spam, Spam enforcement
Tagged Botnets;, Cyber awareness;, Cyber crime, Cyber crime; enforcement; international cooperation, cyber espionage, Cyber fraud;, Cyber Security Strategy:, Cyber security:, fraud, Internet governance;, Malware;, OPTA, public private cooperation cyber crime;, reporting cyber crime, Spam, spam enforcement;
Leave a comment
When cyber awareness undermines cyber security
Recently I moderated a workshop on cyber strategy, attended by persons in the Chief Information Officer function at large(r) companies and institutions. As a 70 minutes workshop does not get a cyber strategy for a company, I aimed for creating … Continue reading
Coordination and cooperation in online threats
In his recent blog post Jan Jaap Oerlemans of Leiden University’s Law school reacted in-depth on the recent cyber security analyses of the Dutch National Cyber Security Centre and the accompanying letter of minister I. Opstelten of Security and Justice. … Continue reading
Posted in Cyber awareness, Cyber crime, Cyber espionage, Cyber security, Cyber warfare, Malware enforcement, Spam enforcement
Tagged Cyber awareness;, Cyber crime; botnets; enforcement, cyber espionage, Cyber fraud;, cyber policy, cyber politics, Cyber Security Strategy:, Cyber security:, Cyber war;, Malware;, Phishing;, public private cooperation cyber crime;, spam enforcement;
Leave a comment
NCSC: PUBLIC-PRIVATE COOPERATION IS KEY
This article was published in Virus Bulletin, issue March 2012 On Thursday 12 January 2012 the Dutch National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) was officially opened. With the push of a big red button, Minister of Security and Justice Ivo Opstelten … Continue reading
Posted in Cyber crime, Cyber crime reporting, Cyber espionage, Cyber security, International cooperation: cross border aspects, Internet governance
Tagged Cyber awareness;, Cyber crime, Cyber crime; botnets; enforcement, Cyber crime; enforcement; international cooperation, cyber policy, cyber politics, Cyber Security Strategy:, Cyber security:, Cyber war;, Internet governance;, public private cooperation cyber crime;, reporting cyber crime
Leave a comment
