US – NL cyber crime treaty signed

On Wednesday 22 February the United States and The Netherlands signed a “declaration of intent” on the cooperation on fighting cyber crime. Reading the news reports three things struck me.

A good thing
Of course up front I declare that the fact that two countries signing a treaty (well, a declaration of intent. This is weaker than a treaty, isn’t it?) to cooperate, share knowledge and best practices concerning cyber crime, is news of progress in dealing with the cross border difficulties countries and agencies run into on a daily basis.

Cyber crime or security treaty?
All headlines I’ve read claim that a cyber crime “treaty” was signed. First I focus on the cyber crime.

1)Even the official communication of the Dutch government mentions cooperation on cyber crime. However looking at the statements of Secretary of Homeland Security Napolitano and Minister Opstelten of Security & Justice mainly focussed on cooperation on protecting vital infrastructure, so e.g. in making scada (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems more secure. If this is the case, we are talking cyber security and not cyber crime.

2) It isn’t a treaty, but a declaration of intent, so an intention to cooperate. So nothing is binding in any way. So we will just have to wait what comes from it. The everyday priorities and cross border cyber crime? The official Dutch government publication speaks of ‘cooperation’ (translation WdN).

Hacking is mentioned as an example of instances in which forensic investigative best practices can be exchanged, but in relation to vital infrastructure. So, is the reference wrong? Did the minister(y) mix up the two concepts? It does not appear that there is more in the text, as it is only an intent to cooperate.

Next to that hacks of these kind, i.e. on vital infrastructure, are often discussed as potential acts of cyber war. That would make that the topic also surpasses security and into the realm of cyber defence. This form of cooperation does not seem intended here.

Bilateral versus multilateral treaty
3) The other comment that I want to make, is that it is a shame that in a cross border environment as cyber crime and cyber security it apparently is still impossible or (too) hard to negotiate a cyber treaty, well declaration of intent, for 27 member states of the EU with the US. The bilateral nature of the declaration means that as soon as there is third country involved in the attack, hack, etc., cooperation ends as the limit of the treaty is reached and it is no longer effective.

Conclusion
This declaration of intent is a not more than a good first step, but the challenges for countries and their national jurisdictions are still stretched beyond what a national jurisdiction can achieve on the Internet as to the topics discussed here.

Wout de Natris, De Natris Consult

24 February 2012, Leiderdorp

Advertisements

About Wout de Natris

As a consultant I specialise in establishing new and different relationships between industry, governments and law enforcement where internet safety and the fight against cyber crime are concerned. This makes me a bridge builder. Hence the blogs name. In this blog I intend to stress the need for interaction, cooperation and exchange of information in order to change the mentioned relationships. On offer: a comprehensive training on all non-technical aspects of spam enforcement and a cyber awareness presentation for companies and institutions
This entry was posted in Cyber crime, Cyber crime reporting, Cyber security, Cyber warfare, International cooperation: cross border aspects and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to US – NL cyber crime treaty signed

  1. Pingback: US – NL cyber crime treaty signed | International cooperation on … · Crime Scene Technician

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s